Comments on: Summary of the Conversation about changes of conversation — Friday night http://pratodialogue.wordpress.com/2006/10/08/summary-of-the-conversation-about-changes-of-conversation-friday-night/ Getting together in Florence: keeping track of memory, forgetting and learning in communities of practice Mon, 17 Nov 2008 09:21:53 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Mathemagenic » Trust in weblog conversations http://pratodialogue.wordpress.com/2006/10/08/summary-of-the-conversation-about-changes-of-conversation-friday-night/#comment-2673 Mathemagenic » Trust in weblog conversations Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:32:46 +0000 http://pratodialogue.wordpress.com/2006/10/08/summary-of-the-conversation-about-changes-of-conversation-friday-night/#comment-2673 [...] Patricia Arnold: In this blog discussion I see a question of trust. I need to know with whom I’m taking. That’ the opposite of the blogger’s attitude. Whoever is reading it is problematic. It’s too anonymous. Trust is missing. [...] [...] Patricia Arnold: In this blog discussion I see a question of trust. I need to know with whom I’m taking. That’ the opposite of the blogger’s attitude. Whoever is reading it is problematic. It’s too anonymous. Trust is missing. [...]

]]> By: Christina http://pratodialogue.wordpress.com/2006/10/08/summary-of-the-conversation-about-changes-of-conversation-friday-night/#comment-46 Christina Wed, 11 Oct 2006 20:05:39 +0000 http://pratodialogue.wordpress.com/2006/10/08/summary-of-the-conversation-about-changes-of-conversation-friday-night/#comment-46 About new layers of communication and blogging in particular: A friend told me the other day that he had decided to create a blog as he had realised that most participants of some management conference gave their blogs as a reference. So my friend who himself is a top manager felt like an outsider and somehow pressed to join the bloggers' club. I've been wondering if we use new forms of interaction (technology) because a) we are supposed to do so and because we cannot afford to not be on the forefront of new trends; b) we would not understand the sociological processes in communities that are accompanied by the new forms of communication and thus unable to proceed in our own learning process; c) we want to share our ideas with the world and hope to get interesting inputs that help us to make progress? Perhaps you keep blogs out of completely different reasons? How does blogging stimulate your learning process? How and WHERE does the learning take place? About new layers of communication and blogging in particular:

A friend told me the other day that he had decided to create a blog as he had realised that most participants of some management conference gave their blogs as a reference. So my friend who himself is a top manager felt like an outsider and somehow pressed to join the bloggers’ club.

I’ve been wondering if we use new forms of interaction (technology) because

a) we are supposed to do so and because we cannot afford to not be on the forefront of new trends;

b) we would not understand the sociological processes in communities that are accompanied by the new forms of communication and thus unable to proceed in our own learning process;

c) we want to share our ideas with the world and hope to get interesting inputs that help us to make progress?

Perhaps you keep blogs out of completely different reasons? How does blogging stimulate your learning process? How and WHERE does the learning take place?

]]> By: btrayner http://pratodialogue.wordpress.com/2006/10/08/summary-of-the-conversation-about-changes-of-conversation-friday-night/#comment-33 btrayner Mon, 09 Oct 2006 07:23:14 +0000 http://pratodialogue.wordpress.com/2006/10/08/summary-of-the-conversation-about-changes-of-conversation-friday-night/#comment-33 There is something reassuring to know that the conversation continues with you now in Australia! You entered our conversations here in Florence, often. Domain related identity. Now that's interesting! Have a great time and say hi to Shawn. There is something reassuring to know that the conversation continues with you now in Australia! You entered our conversations here in Florence, often.

Domain related identity. Now that’s interesting!

Have a great time and say hi to Shawn.

]]> By: Nancy White http://pratodialogue.wordpress.com/2006/10/08/summary-of-the-conversation-about-changes-of-conversation-friday-night/#comment-30 Nancy White Sun, 08 Oct 2006 22:17:40 +0000 http://pratodialogue.wordpress.com/2006/10/08/summary-of-the-conversation-about-changes-of-conversation-friday-night/#comment-30 Hey friends. I just have to share this. I'm sitting in Shawn Callahan's house, he is on a plane from Sydney to Melbourne after leaving you. I just showed the flickr picture to his family (and we laughed and were a bit jealous). So look at that bit of straddling. I am also preparing for the workshops and presentations I'll be doing here in Australia and have been jotting down snippets from your session notes that amplify the ideas and topics I'm planning. So in a way, I'm porting your conversational artefacts to yet another setting. The trust issue, Patricia, is very salient. I was talking a few weeks ago with John and Etienne about a different kind of trust I see in network systems, like blog networks, and I think there is a very strong informational trust. Not that I have to get to know you to trust you ,but I have to get to know what you write about and how you write about it to trust you. But it is a different sort of trust. Not so much about personal identity, but domain related identity. Does that make any sense? I shall be crediting all of you in my work here over the next 3.5 weeks! Hey friends.

I just have to share this. I’m sitting in Shawn Callahan’s house, he is on a plane from Sydney to Melbourne after leaving you. I just showed the flickr picture to his family (and we laughed and were a bit jealous). So look at that bit of straddling.

I am also preparing for the workshops and presentations I’ll be doing here in Australia and have been jotting down snippets from your session notes that amplify the ideas and topics I’m planning. So in a way, I’m porting your conversational artefacts to yet another setting.

The trust issue, Patricia, is very salient. I was talking a few weeks ago with John and Etienne about a different kind of trust I see in network systems, like blog networks, and I think there is a very strong informational trust. Not that I have to get to know you to trust you ,but I have to get to know what you write about and how you write about it to trust you. But it is a different sort of trust. Not so much about personal identity, but domain related identity. Does that make any sense?

I shall be crediting all of you in my work here over the next 3.5 weeks!

]]>