Comments for Prato Dialogue http://pratodialogue.wordpress.com Getting together in Florence: keeping track of memory, forgetting and learning in communities of practice Mon, 17 Nov 2008 09:21:53 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 Comment on About the dialogue by Pierre Faillettaz http://pratodialogue.wordpress.com/about/#comment-2717 Pierre Faillettaz Mon, 17 Nov 2008 09:21:53 +0000 #comment-2717 Completely new here.... the Same quote leapt out at me...especially "works of love". I wonder what else there is besides new relations/learning to do this better?? How I may be included in your process? Thanks for empowering presence. namaste Completely new here…. the Same quote leapt out at me…especially “works of love”. I wonder what else there is besides new relations/learning to do this better?? How I may be included in your process? Thanks for empowering presence. namaste

]]> Comment on Summary of the Conversation about changes of conversation — Friday night by Mathemagenic » Trust in weblog conversations http://pratodialogue.wordpress.com/2006/10/08/summary-of-the-conversation-about-changes-of-conversation-friday-night/#comment-2673 Mathemagenic » Trust in weblog conversations Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:32:46 +0000 http://pratodialogue.wordpress.com/2006/10/08/summary-of-the-conversation-about-changes-of-conversation-friday-night/#comment-2673 [...] Patricia Arnold: In this blog discussion I see a question of trust. I need to know with whom I’m taking. That’ the opposite of the blogger’s attitude. Whoever is reading it is problematic. It’s too anonymous. Trust is missing. [...] [...] Patricia Arnold: In this blog discussion I see a question of trust. I need to know with whom I’m taking. That’ the opposite of the blogger’s attitude. Whoever is reading it is problematic. It’s too anonymous. Trust is missing. [...]

]]> Comment on Some notes about the workshop by Learning Alliances » Analyzing audience feedback http://pratodialogue.wordpress.com/2006/10/10/some-notes-about-the-workshop/#comment-2630 Learning Alliances » Analyzing audience feedback Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:58:24 +0000 http://pratodialogue.wordpress.com/2006/10/10/some-notes-about-the-workshop/#comment-2630 [...] about it quite a few times since then, perhaps because of the strong feelings I had after our workshop at the Prato Conference during the same month. Capturing feedback in a wiki is an interesting example of how technology [...] [...] about it quite a few times since then, perhaps because of the strong feelings I had after our workshop at the Prato Conference during the same month. Capturing feedback in a wiki is an interesting example of how technology [...]

]]> Comment on Some notes about the workshop by Learning Alliances » How long is our collective “now”? http://pratodialogue.wordpress.com/2006/10/10/some-notes-about-the-workshop/#comment-2629 Learning Alliances » How long is our collective “now”? Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:47:39 +0000 http://pratodialogue.wordpress.com/2006/10/10/some-notes-about-the-workshop/#comment-2629 [...] are risks when you assume that the context is a longer relationship than is really the case. People may be offended by the assumption or its apparent consequences. At the CIRN conference in [...] [...] are risks when you assume that the context is a longer relationship than is really the case. People may be offended by the assumption or its apparent consequences. At the CIRN conference in [...]

]]> Comment on Some notes about the workshop by Learning Alliances » Blog Archive » How long is our collective “now”? http://pratodialogue.wordpress.com/2006/10/10/some-notes-about-the-workshop/#comment-125 Learning Alliances » Blog Archive » How long is our collective “now”? Sat, 23 Dec 2006 19:58:43 +0000 http://pratodialogue.wordpress.com/2006/10/10/some-notes-about-the-workshop/#comment-125 [...] There are risks when you assume that the context is a longer relationship than is really the case. People may be offended by the assumption or its apparent consequences. At the CIRN conference in Prato last October, Patricia Arnold, Beverly Trayner and I appeared to be assuming too much familiarity. [...] [...] There are risks when you assume that the context is a longer relationship than is really the case. People may be offended by the assumption or its apparent consequences. At the CIRN conference in Prato last October, Patricia Arnold, Beverly Trayner and I appeared to be assuming too much familiarity. [...]

]]> Comment on Some notes about the workshop by Learning Alliances » Blog Archive » Analyzing audience feedback http://pratodialogue.wordpress.com/2006/10/10/some-notes-about-the-workshop/#comment-78 Learning Alliances » Blog Archive » Analyzing audience feedback Thu, 30 Nov 2006 05:38:03 +0000 http://pratodialogue.wordpress.com/2006/10/10/some-notes-about-the-workshop/#comment-78 [...] Although Nancy White’s posting on “Feedback from Sydney LearnScope Event” was written at the end of her marathon in Australia, I’ve thought about it quite a few times since then, perhaps because of the strong feelings I had after our workshop at the Prato Conference during the same month. Capturing feedback in a wiki is an interesting example of how technology inherently changes our experience of face-to-face meetings just as it changes what’s possible. Reading what the more than 64 people said about the session with Nancy was a bit overwhelming so I made a note to myself to come back and take another look. One easy way to do it was to put the comments into a tool like http://tagcrowd.com/ (a tool that happened to hear of from Nancy). Here’s the output: [...] [...] Although Nancy White’s posting on “Feedback from Sydney LearnScope Event” was written at the end of her marathon in Australia, I’ve thought about it quite a few times since then, perhaps because of the strong feelings I had after our workshop at the Prato Conference during the same month. Capturing feedback in a wiki is an interesting example of how technology inherently changes our experience of face-to-face meetings just as it changes what’s possible. Reading what the more than 64 people said about the session with Nancy was a bit overwhelming so I made a note to myself to come back and take another look. One easy way to do it was to put the comments into a tool like http://tagcrowd.com/ (a tool that happened to hear of from Nancy). Here’s the output: [...]

]]> Comment on Some notes about the workshop by Christina http://pratodialogue.wordpress.com/2006/10/10/some-notes-about-the-workshop/#comment-54 Christina Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:24:03 +0000 http://pratodialogue.wordpress.com/2006/10/10/some-notes-about-the-workshop/#comment-54 If it fits into a bigger whole! ;) If it fits into a bigger whole! ;)

]]> Comment on Some notes about the workshop by btrayner http://pratodialogue.wordpress.com/2006/10/10/some-notes-about-the-workshop/#comment-53 btrayner Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:54:50 +0000 http://pratodialogue.wordpress.com/2006/10/10/some-notes-about-the-workshop/#comment-53 Are you offering to do that evaluation Christina? :-) I think you'll find memories of the reasoning behind using the blog scattered in the CP2 space and the telephone notes or recordings. In many online communities flickr has become a fairly standard shared practice for sharing photos at conferences. The wiki is the CIRN conference wiki. I'm not sure if anyone has put anything about our workshop in it yet. Are you offering to do that evaluation
Christina?

:-)

I think you’ll find memories of the reasoning behind using the blog scattered in the CP2 space and the telephone notes or recordings.

In many online communities flickr has become a fairly standard shared practice for sharing photos at conferences.

The wiki is the CIRN conference wiki. I’m not sure if anyone has put anything about our workshop in it yet.

]]> Comment on Some notes about the workshop by Christina http://pratodialogue.wordpress.com/2006/10/10/some-notes-about-the-workshop/#comment-52 Christina Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:06:29 +0000 http://pratodialogue.wordpress.com/2006/10/10/some-notes-about-the-workshop/#comment-52 As for the different layers of interaction: We talk about the photos taken during the workshop in Florence here, don't we? I'm asking this as I found out that some participant(s) of that very workshop do not have a hint of what's been discussed here in the blog. One more stupid question (forgive me): Did you clarify why you decided to use the different "layers of interaction", i.e., the CP2 space, the blog here, flickr (somehow) and now also wiki to discuss about one event? Was it simply an experiment or has the benefit of using different tools been evaluated or are you going to do that? As for the different layers of interaction:

We talk about the photos taken during the workshop in Florence here, don’t we? I’m asking this as I found out that some participant(s) of that very workshop do not have a hint of what’s been discussed here in the blog.

One more stupid question (forgive me): Did you clarify why you decided to use the different “layers of interaction”, i.e., the CP2 space, the blog here, flickr (somehow) and now also wiki to discuss about one event? Was it simply an experiment or has the benefit of using different tools been evaluated or are you going to do that?

]]> Comment on Some notes about the workshop by btrayner http://pratodialogue.wordpress.com/2006/10/10/some-notes-about-the-workshop/#comment-51 btrayner Sun, 15 Oct 2006 20:23:08 +0000 http://pratodialogue.wordpress.com/2006/10/10/some-notes-about-the-workshop/#comment-51 Given that taking photos has become quite standard practice for conferences I'm also interested in the question of why the people who objected didn't say anything when we started taking them. That doesn't detract from the pertinant question it raises about taking them and about informing people what they will be used for. It's more a question about how we structured the workshop that even people who are used to attending conferences, doing research, and who are used to being assertive, didn't feel comfortable enough to object to photos being taken - even when they felt strongly about it. Given that taking photos has become quite standard practice for conferences I’m also interested in the question of why the people who objected didn’t say anything when we started taking them.

That doesn’t detract from the pertinant question it raises about taking them and about informing people what they will be used for.

It’s more a question about how we structured the workshop that even people who are used to attending conferences, doing research, and who are used to being assertive, didn’t feel comfortable enough to object to photos being taken – even when they felt strongly about it.

]]>